The Cautionary Tale of Bento Africa

How do you justify a company built to ensure that other businesses pay their staff smoothly, only for it to later emerge that money deducted from its own employees’ paychecks never reached their retirement funds, or pension funds, as Nigerians call them? That question sits at the heart of Bento Africa’s collapse.

At its peak, Bento was a promising Nigerian HR tech startup with $2 million in venture funding and growing visibility within Africa’s startup ecosystem. Its pitch was straightforward: simplify payroll, compliance, and people operations for businesses. But by the time the company ceased operations in 2023, it had become a case study in how structural weaknesses, poor governance, and financial opacity can bring even well-funded startups down, leaving unpaid wages, angry clients, and employees stripped of future savings.

The warning signs appeared long before the shutdown. Employees complained of delayed salaries, ineffective leadership, and a workplace culture where asking hard questions carried risk. Internally, trust was already fraying. Then, shortly after Bento went quiet, a disclosure pushed the story into public view. Tech advocate HackSultan revealed that Bento Africa had deducted pension contributions from employees' salaries without remitting them to the National Pension Commission (PENCOM) in Nigeria.

This was not a short-term lapse. Allegations pointed to repeated deductions over an extended period, with no remittance at all. Former employees backed the claims by sharing payslips alongside PENCOM statements showing zero balances. What emerged was more than a failed startup. It was a serious breach of statutory obligation and employee trust, with real consequences for workers, who now face potential retirement shortfalls. The pension issue quickly became central to Bento’s collapse, reframing the discussion from operational failure to possible financial misconduct.

A closer look reveals a pattern of interconnected breakdowns rather than a single point of failure.

Culture and governance

Bento’s internal culture appeared to reward silence and discourage scrutiny. Former employees described leadership that communicated poorly and avoided accountability. Workers hesitated to raise concerns or challenge decisions, fearing repercussions. Without psychological safety or clear feedback channels, problems that could have been addressed early were buried. Leadership operated with limited transparency and internal challenge, allowing a toxic environment to obscure deeper structural issues.

Operational weaknesses at the core

Bento expanded quickly, but its internal systems did not keep pace. The company prioritised customer acquisition, while the infrastructure responsible for accurate, reliable payroll processing struggled with technical shortcomings. For a business handling sensitive financial transactions, this imbalance was costly. Operational discipline and system reliability are not optional at scale; they are foundational. Bento failed to demonstrate either.

Financial mismanagement

If there was a red flag that should not have been missed, it was the handling of employee pension funds. The deductions-and-non-remittance pattern pointed to a collapse in basic financial controls and regulatory compliance. Deducting pension contributions and failing to remit them is a grave legal violation and a profound breach of trust.

The episode also raised broader questions about Bento’s financial health. The company appeared to be spending faster than it earned, with weak cost controls and mounting cash flow pressure. Were the revenues from clients, especially smaller ones, sufficient to cover the true cost of acquisition and service delivery? The abrupt shutdown suggested that any financial buffers had been quickly exhausted.

External pressure from frozen funding

Bento’s internal problems collided with an unforgiving external environment. The global tech funding slowdown of 2022 and 2023 hit African startups hard, as investors pulled back and follow-on capital became scarce. For a company already burning cash and struggling with unit economics, the shift proved fatal. The downturn did not create Bento’s problems; it exposed them.

Bento Africa’s story carries lessons that extend beyond a single company. Transparency and accountability are not optional; they are the mechanisms that allow organisations to surface risk early and respond. Growth must be disciplined. Scaling before achieving operational stability and product-market fit is not ambition, it is recklessness. Founders must prioritise resilient systems over vanity metrics.

Financial discipline is equally non-negotiable. Strong cash flow management, clear unit economics, and absolute integrity in handling client and employee funds, especially statutory deductions, are sacrosanct. The PENCOM scandal is a depressing reminder of the human cost of financial negligence. Governance matters too. Effective oversight and a strong board are critical safeguards against poor judgment and mismanagement.

Bento’s collapse shows what happens when these fundamentals are ignored. The damage extends beyond one startup, harming individuals and eroding trust across the broader African tech ecosystem. For this generation and the next of founders, the obligation is clear: build companies that are not only innovative and fast-growing, but also accountable, durable, and worthy of trust.

Your next read: Why Startups need board governance from day one